When you deliver Training on research process and writing a scientific paper, your comments should be honest but always respectful and accompanied with suggestions to improve the manuscript.
However, if the mechanism being tested does not really provide new knowledge, or if the method and study design are of insufficient quality, then my hopes for a manuscript are rather low.
If there is a major flaw or concern, I try to be honest and back it up with evidence. What do you consider when deciding whether to accept an invitation to review a paper? Short reviews translate into strong recommendations and vice versa. I also pay attention to the schemes and figures; if they are well designed and organized, then in most cases the entire paper has also been carefully thought out.
Are the methods robust and well controlled? If the authors have presented a new tool or software, I will test it in detail.
So now, I only sign my reviews so as to be fully transparent on the rare occasions when I suggest that the authors cite papers of mine, which I only do when my work will remedy factual errors or correct the claim that something has never been addressed before.
I even selectively check individual numbers to see whether they are statistically plausible. Waiting another day always seems to improve the review.
I try to be as constructive as possible. Does the theoretical argument make sense? This is done all the time, to varying degrees. I always comment on the form of the paper, highlighting whether it is well written, has correct grammar, and follows a correct structure.
Then I scrutinize it section by section, noting if there are any missing links in the story and if certain points are under- or overrepresented.
If you make a practice of signing reviews, then over the years, many of your colleagues will have received reviews with your name on them. I usually write down all the things that I noticed, good and bad, so my decision does not influence the content and length of my review.
Before submitting a review, I ask myself whether I would be comfortable if my identity as a reviewer was known to the authors. When diving in deeper, first I try to assess whether all the important papers are cited in the references, as that also often correlates with the quality of the manuscript itself.
Finally, I evaluate whether the methodology used is appropriate. One should review the paper justly and entirely on its merit, even if it comes from a competing research group.
Sloppiness anywhere makes me worry. Many reviewers are not polite enough. Depending on how much time I have, I sometimes also end with a section of minor comments. Altogether, it usually takes me more than a day. What is the paper about?
To me, it is biased to reach a verdict on a paper based on how groundbreaking or novel the results are, for example.7 steps to publishing in a scientific journal base our work on robust data and use an appropriate research methodology.
As we write up our findings, we aim to provide theoretical insight, and share theoretical and practical implications about our work. Day, R, & Gastel, B: How to write and publish a scientific paper. Cambridge. Writing a Scientific Research Paper Writing Resources Besides the information noted in your course materials and this handout, other writing Writing Process Sample W riting Process Prewriting • Make notes, scribble ideas:.
11 steps to structuring a science paper editors will take seriously I'll review each step in more detail. But before you set out to write a paper, there are two important things you should do that will set the groundwork for the entire process.
State the purpose of the paper and research strategy adopted to answer the question, but do. WRITING A RESEARCH PAPER USING THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD STEPS 1. PROBLEM- In the problem you need to state what it is you are trying to solve in your.
This is a conversation with her and the Editage Insights team Read More. Videos & Slideshare. POPULAR ARTICLES. A global perspective on plagiarism I gained valuable information about research publication process and oral presentation at Editage workshop. I learned the clues about how to write a scientific research paper.
The. interest is a crucial first step in planning a paper. Planning a scientific writing as-signment involves locating appropriate source articles, reading the articles, and tak- firmly based on scientific research. Multiple sources are available on the internet, in WRITING IN APA STYLE.
THE BASICS OF SCIENTIFIC WRITING IN APA STYLE .Download