Our bodies and steels cannot handle the intense pressure they have for more then a half hour. In space the resources are pretty much infinite in amount. Space exploration gave impetus to projects that have been useful, as well as providing valuable scientific knowledge.
You will not receive any promotional materials from third parties. Why bother spending all this money on exploring space when we could be helping our own planet that us humans live on. Wielding their flammable cupcakes, the ninjas will descend upon the earth and kill the enemies of those they work for.
No, sorry this is a mistake. This is actually your analogy? Production of these product leads to redevelopment, sales and distribution - all of which leads to more jobs; somebody has to build, sell, and repair. Suppose no one had ever wondered if there was another little village somewhere in the world.
Thirdly, "some really interesting girls" is by far the best analogy based metaphor for scientific knowledge I have ever heard.
All the by-products of the space race could have been developed by commercial companies aiming to make a profit by developing good products and selling them, at Space exploration should be abolished fraction of the cost: A normal pan still cooks your meals, buttons and zips can do up your jumpers or clothes.
Are we now going to turn our backs and let them take the mantle we have carried proudly for the past 40 years? Satellites were some of the first venturers into space and are another critical part of our society. People argue that we could spend the money feeding children in need. The thousands of starving people cannot survive without food so why spend money on products which we do not need.
Space is the final frontier, and it calls to the explorer in all of us. Discovery and Exploration Think about it as you would from ancient events in Eurasia. For example, in order to travel, roundtrip, to a star 5 parsecs from earth This is were research happens.
If people had just stayed in their own locations they would find ways to become highly advanced in regards to those locations. To attack space exploration in this manner is to attack the purpose of scientific research in general.
Future human Mars missions will almost certainly involve multiple space agencies to spread the cost among several nations. It could be used to increase the efforts to combat terminal illnesses or to battle pollution.
Should highly qualified professionals and scientists risk their lives traveling outside Earth? What price to pay for knowing that in the future, humanity can be saved because there are other planets out there capable of sustaining life? What kind of space program should we promote and what to do next, with it remains a chronic question.
From healthier baby food to technology to better diagnose breast cancer, to farther flying golf balls, NASA technology is all around you. Report this Argument Con My opponent mentioned that we could be using this money for feeding people however we are helping people since it has benifitted the world.
Number of Scientists spend their knowledge building Artificial Satellites.
Daniel Boorstin, The Discoverersespecially pp. That is even more money to fix those problems. Overpopulation could become a serious worldwide threat.
The answer is not far fetched because the punch newspaper on 15th may has proven that most of the countries that explore the space do it for their military strenght and not for the good of the people.
If we have to use the money for something i would strongly approve that we use it for space exploration.Space exploration is a hugely expensive affair. Should we spend money on space exploration when we have so many problems on planet Earth?
We debate the pros and cons of space exploration and the reasons for investing in space agencies and programs. A lot of people may say that space exploration should be abolished because it is a waste of money, but think of how much we have advanced in our knowledge of space.
This has to be known because some of the planets and moons we have discovered are suitable for us to live on when we move from Earth, so it is essential that man knows about space and we constantly have to keep updating and developing our.
Space exploration is worth the cost, but not how the money is being spent. Although space exploration is and could be very beneficial, there is no point in spending trillions of dollars a year on technology which is still relatively basic.
Space Exploration is a waste of resources.
Instead of decreasing resources by space travel and such, we must deal with problems on Earth first. Why bother spending all this money on exploring space when we could be helping our own planet that us humans live on.
Today there are ample reasons one might give not to continue space exploration. --supposed to be the year of Arthur C.
Clarke's "Space Odyssey," will forever be remembered instead for the events of 9/ We do have to deal with the reality of world events.
Sep 22, · In addition, $17 billion dollars should not be arbitrarily spent in order to "lift our national spirit" through space exploration but should instead be given back to the taxpayers and allow them to lift their own spirits with the wealth.Download