The difference between 17 and 18 is insignificant, if you want to make a real difference to accidents cause by inexperienced, immature and unimaginative drivers then a more radical change is necessary. The alternatives to making a test harder is still not a good way to keep the young teenagers from driving reckless.
Yes, "Only by carrying out the change will we be able to see if it works or not" is a poor idea but with the statistics of many young drivers and accidents, it proves that the age should rise up.
Thank you; I will expand later on in my next speech.
This means that new drivers have to go through two or more stages or restrictions before they earn a full license.
So I firmly believe that the minimum age to obtain a drivers license should not be raised to 18! Teens have to get experience somehow and the only place to do that is behind the wheel.
Driving and endangering lives is not freedom. Peoples minds at a young age are very distracted with a lot of information from school, friends, and parents. Some kids might even go to college without a license. This may lead them to learn from less experienced drivers such as their peers of the same age, or even attempt to teach themselves without instruction.
There are many smart teenagers that can pass a test but it is different when getting behind the wheel by themselves or with other passengers.
Driving ability should be judged more - why not also a maximum age?! If we raise the driving the number of accidents would go down considerably. They will be independent and learn what it is like to become an adult. Maximum words Submit The minimum drivers license age should not be raised to 18 because year-olds are more responsible and have a much more focused mind.
It would be possible to offer free or heavily subsidised travel on public transport for young people up to the age of 21 which would encourage more environmentally friendly attitudes in the next generation. Raising the driving age will lower this number considerably.
In addition to that what if 18 year olds got their lisense at 16 wich totally disproves your point,when you said studies show that 16 year olds have more car crashes thent 18 year olds! The assumption that teens lack maturity to drive is highly incorrect People have this overly assertive position against 16 year old drivers from driving and believe they should take the iniative to raise the legal age to start at It stops unhealthy multitasking habits.
Many countries have already done this. I can also admit to being immature during high school as well as seeing a lot more immature teens.The Minimum Driving Age Should Be Raised to 18 Please cast your vote after you've read the arguments.
You can also add to the debate by leaving a comment at the end of the page. By raising the driving age 2 years, older teens may be encouraged to exercise more and learn healthier habits since the car isn’t available to them. 2.
It stops unhealthy multitasking habits. Driving at the age of 18 is a more mature age for teens because they can have more responsibility. Teens should not be driving at the age of 16 because they could be texting and driving or drinking and driving with some friends.
One of the reasons why the driving age should raise to 18 is because teens could get reckless while they drive. Full Answer. Economics Help notes the numerous practical disadvantages of raising the minimum driving age, as well as the fact that some states are seeking to raise the minimum age.
The legal age to receive a commercial drivers license is 18 years old, but most don’t obtain their commercial drivers license until after the age of The most dangerous truck drivers on the road are those with under 2 years of experience, regardless of age. Nov 20, · The argument for drivers to be a minimum of 18 is because because teenagers have a high ego when it comes to driving.
Whats the first thing they are gonna do when they have a drivers license? Majority of them are gonna give rides to friends mint-body.com: Resolved.Download