It will be vital reading for political scientists, historians, policymakers, students, and anyone concerned with the future of American politics and society. He traces two related but distinctive approaches to the issue of presidential character and psychology.
Neither a polemic nor a whitewash, this book provides a careful analysis of the Bush Doctrine—its development, application, and rationale—and assesses its legacy: During the last few months though, Clinton has been arguing with Congress to get an increase past.
Essays by a broad array of academic experts address these and other questions from diverse perspectives. He feels that he can do anything and with that ambition, it leads him to overexert himself. Renshon points out many instances that Clinton has backed out of his promises at the time, but some of the situations have become law since this book was written.
It is therefore deeply embedded in the foundation of psychological functioning" He also states that since the president is so motivated to be unconditionally involved, he runs the risk of overextending himself both physically and psychologically.
Throughout his presidency, Clinton has also shown to be a very ambitious man. Case studies of key leadership decisions combine with theoretical overviews and analyses to offer a highly textured portrait of judgment in action in the all-important foreign policy arena.
Stanley Renshon, High Hopes: Clinton and Gore have stressed that a New Democrats policies are, "neither liberal of conservative, neither Democratic of Republican. Theory and Application Lanham: Throughout this argument, the opposition stated that Clinton "could change his mind in an instant" According to Microsoft Bookshelf "95, grandiosity is someone or something that is characterized by the greatness of scope of intent.
Obama took office with extraordinarily high expectations and a palpable hunger in the American psyche for a new national direction.
Bush offer one set of strategic answers for how President Obama can confront those dangers. Can Clinton be trusted? I feel that this quote has more to do with Clinton protecting himself and all of his decisions throughout all of his term, instead of admitting there was a problem.
It provides a systematic theory of the linkage between basic human needs and political behavior. These questions cannot be answered without recourse to psychological analysis.
Renshon uses the perspective of political psychology to help us to see old issues in new ways, and new issues in different ways. Through this approach Clinton believed he understood the limits of government, but, upon gaining office he attempted to launch an, "ambitious personal and public agenda" The three elements of character that Renshon states as being the "core" factors of a persons character are: Throughout this argument, the opposition stated that Clinton "could change his mind in an instant" Many of the ideals on which the country was founded are under intense, often angry, debate, and the historic tension between individuality and community has never been felt so keenly.
As Renshon states, "Character shapes beliefs, information processing, and, ultimately, styles of behavior. Reassessing the Bush Doctrine New York: Individual and group rights have expanded, eliciting acerbic debate about the legitimacy and limits of claims.
Renshon points out many instances that Clinton has backed out of his promises at the time, but some of the situations have become law since this book was written.
What of his leadership style? Routledge, September 8, The Bush Doctrine is dead! To me, this again leads to a very interesting question, Is Mr.
When does political learning take place? Renshon turns a critical eye to the challenges posed over the past four decades by multiculturalism, cultural conflict, and global citizenship and puts forth a comprehensive proposal for reforming dual citizenship and helping immigrants and citizens alike become more integrated into the American national community.
Taking his ambition to the limit, Clinton proposed that he was "a president who would return to traditional values and who, in discussing the importance of personal responsibility, seemed to be conveying an appreciation of the limits of government" And at the heart of choice lies judgment.
Arguing that the glue that binds this country together is a psychological force—patriotism— he explains why powerful emotional attachments are critical to American civic process and how they make possible united action in times of crisis.
The important concept of political learning through the life cycle receives special attention.
Understanding that once in a while he will make mistakes, although he is not the type of man to openly admit it, Clinton began his term by stretching the limits of government.
When one refers to the "traditional Democrat, "New Deal liberal, "goldwater conservatives," or "new Democrat," according to Renshon, they are all relatively the same basic idea.
However, a concerted effort is underway to gain acceptance for, and implement, the idea that the United States should allow new immigrants to vote without becoming citizens.Stanley Renshons' High Hopes: Clinton's Actions Throughout Stanley Renshons' book, High Hopes: The Clinton Presidency and the Politics of Ambition, the president's ability to govern has to do with.
Renshon explores the nature of the Clinton marriage as a political partnership and looks at Hillary Clinton as an associate president. High Hopes gives us a new understanding of why a man with so many talents has become a president whose performance has not measured up to his promise.
His book about Bill Clinton, High Hopes: The Clinton Presidency and the Politics of Ambition, was awarded the Gradiva Award from the National Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis for the best published work in the category of biography in and the Richard E. Neustadt Award from the American Political Science Association for the best book published on the presidency.
An Analysis of Stanley Renshon's Book High Hopes: The Clinton Presidency and the Politics of Ambition PAGES 7. WORDS 2, View Full Essay. More essays like this: stanley renshon, high hopes, the clinton presidency and the politics of ambition.
Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin. High Hopes: The Clinton Presidency and the Politics of Ambition by Stanley A. Renshon Now in paperback, this perceptive psychological portrait of Clinton and his presidency investigates whether Clinton has demonstrated the necessary qualities of judgment, vision, character and skill, as well as his ambition and extreme mint-body.com: $ High Hopes Throughout Stanley Renshons' book, High Hopes: The Clinton Presidency and the Politics of Ambition, the president's ability to govern has to do with three 3/5(2).Download